B300 SXM vs H200 SXM5
NVIDIA B300 SXM (Blackwell Ultra, 288 GB) against NVIDIA H200 SXM5 (Hopper, 141 GB): memory, compute, power and rental price, compared for LLM inference and training.
Pick two GPUs to compare
Side-by-Side Specifications
| Spec | B300 SXM | H200 SXM5 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Blackwell Ultra | Hopper |
| Memory | 288 GB HBM3e | 141 GB HBM3e |
| Memory bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | 4,800 GB/s |
| FP16 tensor compute | 5,000 TFLOPS | 1,979 TFLOPS |
| INT8 tensor compute | 10,000 TOPS | 3,958 TOPS |
| Interconnect | NVLink 5.0 · 1800 GB/s | NVLink 4.0 · 900 GB/s |
| TDP | 1400 W | 700 W |
| Est. on-demand price | ~$18.00/h | ~$10.00/h |
| FP16 TFLOPS per $/h | 278 | 198 |
Highlighted values indicate the stronger spec. Hourly rates are indicative on-demand estimates.
Verdict
Raw performance: The B300 SXM leads on FP16 tensor compute (2.5x advantage), which translates directly into higher token throughput for inference and shorter training steps.
Memory: With 288 GB per card, the B300 SXM fits larger models on fewer GPUs — fewer cards means less inter-GPU communication and simpler deployments.
Value: At current on-demand rates, the B300 SXM delivers more compute per dollar (278 vs 198 FP16 TFLOPS per $/h). If your model fits in its VRAM budget, it is usually the more economical choice.
GPUs Needed for Popular LLMs
Cards required to serve each model at 8-bit quantization (with 20% overhead for activations and KV cache).
| Model | VRAM (8-bit) | B300 SXM | H200 SXM5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Sol | 2682 GB | 10x | 20x |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (671B) | 750 GB | 3x | 6x |
| Muse Spark 1.1 | 335 GB | 2x | 3x |
| Claude 5 Sonnet (175B) | 196 GB | 1x | 2x |
| Nova Premier (80B) | 89 GB | 1x | 1x |
| Nova Core (34B) | 38 GB | 1x | 1x |
| Nova Lite (12B) | 13 GB | 1x | 1x |
| Phi 3.5 (3.8B) | 4 GB | 1x | 1x |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for LLM inference: B300 SXM or H200 SXM5?
The B300 SXM delivers more raw FP16 compute (5,000 TFLOPS) and the B300 SXM offers the most memory per card (288 GB). For cost-efficiency, the B300 SXM currently gives more FP16 TFLOPS per dollar of on-demand rental (278 vs 198 TFLOPS per $/h).
How much more memory does the B300 SXM have?
The B300 SXM has 288 GB of HBM3e versus 141 GB of HBM3e for the H200 SXM5 — a ratio of 2.04x in favor of the B300 SXM. More VRAM per card means fewer GPUs to fit a given model.
Is the B300 SXM or the H200 SXM5 cheaper to rent?
Estimated on-demand rates are ~$18.00/h for the B300 SXM and ~$10.00/h for the H200 SXM5. Raw hourly price is only part of the story: normalize by throughput (TFLOPS per $/h) and by how many cards you need for your model's VRAM.
How do the B300 SXM and H200 SXM5 compare on power?
The B300 SXM has a TDP of 1400W versus 700W for the H200 SXM5. FP16 compute per watt: 3.6 vs 2.8 TFLOPS/W.
Deploy on a GPU cloud
Rent the B300 SXM or H200 SXM5 by the hour instead of buying hardware.
